A statewide coalition of grocery stores will again seek state approval to sell wine, and it hopes new lobbying efforts help sway legislators’ minds.
Article originally posted by the (Northern Kentucky) Kentucky Enquirer directed to: https://secure.pqarchiver.com/enquirer/access/1871745501.html?FMT=FT&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Oct+5%2C+2009&author=Amanda+Van+Benschoten&pub=Cincinnati+Enquirer&edition=&startpage=n%2Fa&desc=Stores+try+again+to+win+wine+sales
By Amanda Van Benschoten
A statewide coalition of grocery stores will again seek state approval to sell wine, and it hopes new lobbying efforts help sway legislators’ minds.
The Food with Wine Coalition has backed the issue since 2007, with little success.
Kentucky is among 16 states that ban the sale of wine in grocery stores. Neighboring Indiana and Ohio allow it.
“It’s an antiquated law, and it’s time to change it,” said coalition spokesman Luke Schmidt. “It’s time for Kentucky to step up and be more progressive in the way that it approaches this.”
The coalition has launched an online petition drive in advance of the legislative session that begins in January.
Through Thanksgiving, customers age 21 and over in more than 100 grocery stores across the state will be asked to visit the group’s Web site and sign the petition. That generates a form letter, which is sent to the individual’s state representative and senator.
It’s a more targeted approach than the group’s in-store petition drive last year, when more than 56,000 people signed it.
The coalition says unscientific polls by media outlets show more than 90 percent of voters support selling wine in grocery stores, but the measure has not yet gained any traction in the legislature.
House Speaker Pro Tem Larry Clark, D-Louisville, filed a bill in 2008 that never made it out of committee.
Through a spokeswoman, Clark said he would support a measure that provides floor space to promote and sell Kentucky-made wine.
Rep. Adam Koenig, R-Erlanger, sought to file a bill again last spring, but couldn’t get Democratic support.
The coalition’s goal in 2010 is to at least get a hearing in the House. For that to happen, the measure will need the support of Democratic leaders.
“I hope it gets somewhere, because it’s an opportunity to raise money without raising taxes – and we need to take as many of those opportunities as we can find in this economic climate,” Koenig said.
The coalition says selling wine in the stores would raise $83.5 million in new tax revenue over five years.
And, Schmidt said, it would aid the state’s growing wine industry by creating between 300 and 400 new sales outlets for Kentucky-made wine.
Erlanger-based Remke Markets already carries about 200 Kentucky-made products in its seven stores, and it plans to stock Kentucky-made wine if the measure is approved.
Tom Litzler, director of business and government relations for Remke, said wine is, by far, the most-requested item by customers.
“If you’re allowed to sell beer, we don’t see any logic to why you’re not allowed to sell wine,” he said. “It’s because of a law that goes back to the days of Prohibition.”
The liquor store industry has opposed the bill, but supporters believe more competition will help, not hurt, the industry and customers.
“This is pro-consumer, any way you look at it. It expands choice in the marketplace, and it expands competition. And we believe that competition is good for the overall marketplace,” Schmidt said.
The owners of Party Source and Cork & Bottle, Northern Kentucky’s largest liquor stores, did not respond to messages seeking comment.
The coalition’s proposal – and its lobbying efforts – only affect “wet” counties, or those that allow alcohol sales.
“Legislators, in our view, can feel comfortable in passing this bill, knowing that it’s not going to alter the lifestyle in a dry county, but the dry county will clearly benefit from the revenue flow,” Schmidt said.
The group’s Web site is foodwithwine.org.